The Angry Snowboarder
  • Editorial
    • Snowboarding News
    • Teen Time
    • Real Marketing Ads
  • Gear Reviews
    • Snowboard Reviews
    • Snowboard Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Movie Reviews
    • Snowboard Outerwear Reviews
    • Accessory Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Snowboard Videos
    • Shred Edits
    • Full Parts
    • Season Edits
    • Teasers
    • Free Movies
    • Parks and Wrecks
  • Tech Talk
  • Press Releases
  • Contact
Gear Reviews, Snowboard Reviews 28

The 2022 Jones Mountain Twin Snowboard Review

By Angrysnowboarder @angrysnowboard · On October 22, 2021

Board: Jones Mountain Twin

Size: 157

Camber Option: Camrocker. Camber through the middle with rocker in the tip and tail.

Bindings: Rome Black Label

Stance: 21.5 Wide 15 Negative 12 Goofy

Boots: K2 Thraxis Size 10

My Weight: 200lbs

Resort: Copper Mountain

Conditions: Sunny bluebird skies, moderate winds at time, warmer temps, fresh fast corduroy that slowly turned into sloppy slush as the day went on.

Flex: This is a full blown middle of the road park flex on this board these days. The tips have been softened up since the last time I rode it and that makes it more playful, while the camber section retains the flex from the previous model. There’s a decent amount of torsional flex and that is noticeable when you ankle steer it.

Stability: The tips are a lot more loose with the softer flex and the 3D shaping so you get a fair amount of chatter and that does resonate through the rocker section back to the camber zone. Underfoot and through the middle is more stable but you will feel the more abrupt changes in the snow as well as the ruts. It’s still a fairly stable board but it gains some liveliness in this iteration.

Ollies: Loading up the camber section takes next to no effort and that makes it easy to snap with this board. When the camber is loaded up it causes the rocker to act like a springboard which does add to the boost of this board. If you’re the type of rider that likes to send sidehits and launch rollers this thing has you covered easily.

Pop On Jumps: The snaps there and this board gets the job done. Small, medium, and even large features to an extent are not an issue on this deck. It snaps off the lip with relative ease.

Butterability: Here’s the thing with the softer tips and that 3D shaping this board has a mellow spoonlike effect to the tips. This makes it ideal for getting sideways and swiveling around on the nose or tail. When you press into it this board locks in and holds with a very little amount of fight to it, but just enough to allow you to pop out of any ground press.

Jibbing: The tips lock into presses with ease and hold due to the rocker and flex pattern. You can feel it lock in and there’s just a little bit of rebound from the camber section. This gives you the pop off the end of a feature without too much effort. When you get sideways the camber section takes over and hugs the feature giving you that cradle-like effect you know. It feels very predictable when you get sideways now.

Carving: With the 3D shaping of this boards tips coupled with the rocker you get a smoother roll in and out of turns. It’s not necessarily nimble as it is effortless. When it’s on edge the traction technology takes over and really lets you feel it lock in. When you drive this board you notice that you’re steering more just outside the insert pack than out at the tips. This gives it a more predictable control. Now when you rail a hard carve and you’re sitting on the tail expecting it to give power out of the turn you do lose a little bit of edge bite at the end and that changes the dynamic of the carve. Overall this thing is consistent on short quick carves and hard drawn out ones. It just tends to lack a bit of the precision previous models had.

Rider in Mind: All mountain rider with a more freestyle emphasis.

Personal Thoughts: I’m not sure softening it up and giving it that much 3D shaping in the tips was the right way to go with this board, but then again what do I know it’s not my brand. It’s more playful than previous iterations and it really does lean into the freestyle side of things with this board and less into the all mountain aspect. If anything I feel that this is now their full freestyle board.

Comparable Boards: Nitro Team, Capita Outsiders, Arbor Westmark Camber

Binding Recommendations: Rome Katana, Now Selects, Burton Cartel

jones mountain twin snowboard reviewjones snowboard reviewreviewsnowboard review

Angrysnowboarder

More than likely he has pissed you off, shocked, amazed, or mortified you at some point with his ramblings. Yet, you still continue to read what he writes.

You Might Also Like

  • Gear Reviews

    The Korua Shapes Otto Plus Snowboard Review

  • Gear Reviews

    The Korua Shapes Pin Tonic Snowboard Review

  • Gear Reviews

    The Korua Shapes Pencil Plus Snowboard Review

28 Comments

  • Andy says: December 27, 2021 at 7:46 am

    Hello, thank you for review.
    Could you advice if with weight 200 lbs and boot size 11 to ride mostly in groomers, should I take 157 cm or go for bigger size 160 cm?

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: December 27, 2021 at 1:49 pm

      Sure.

      Reply
  • Andrew says: January 2, 2022 at 1:33 am

    Hello, thanks for the great review. Could you please advise the correct board size? 183 cm, 90 kg, Burton Imperial US11 boots, Malavita bindings L size. strong intermediate rider 54 years old. I am considering a size of 157, 159W or 160, for riding mainly on groomers, occasionally outside. Which size do you think will be the best? Could Capita Mercury or YES Standard possibly be a good choice? What size? I have read reviews which show that JMT 160 gives the impression of a very long board, because of the long edge effective in comparison with other boards of similar size, e.g. 123.4 cm JMT 160 cm vs 118.8 cm in the case of YES Standard 159. Is it true ? In this case, is it not a good idea to downsize the board? But I’m affraid if JMT 157 will be to narrow. I’m riding with +18/ -18 angles or +15/-15. Maybe a bite wider board as YES Standard 156 will be OK if I would like to try more uneven terrain? Will it be more manuverable? How about holding on the edge during faster ride on groomers? Maybe you could suggest a different board, more suitable for my specification and purposes. Looking forwward your reply. Regards Andrew.

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: January 2, 2022 at 7:08 am

      Holy wall of text. 59w. Go watch some reviews I answer all these questions there, if you don’t feel they’re answered that’s on you.

      Reply
  • Ole says: January 2, 2022 at 4:10 pm

    Hey man,
    I am 155 lbs and have a 10,5 boot size, intermediate/advanced, so tending between 156w and 157… what’s your recommendation? What’s the exact effect of the wide version in terms of performance if there’s any?
    Cheers

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: January 2, 2022 at 4:45 pm

      I’d go with the wide, you get a little more stability and it will float better.

      Reply
  • Stijn Remans says: January 5, 2022 at 12:53 am

    Hi thanks for the review,

    Could you tell me if there is a difference in the mountain twin 2021 red/black en the one from 2022. Or is just the print that changed.

    Thanks in advance

    Stijn.

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: January 7, 2022 at 9:42 am

      They changed the core profile.

      Reply
  • Austin says: January 18, 2022 at 1:09 am

    Hey man,
    I am 5’9” 153 lbs and have a 10.5 boot size, intermediate, so debating between 154 and 156w… what’s your recommendation?

    Thanks!
    Austin

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: January 18, 2022 at 9:29 am

      54 would fit your weight better.

      Reply
  • Austin says: January 19, 2022 at 12:16 am

    Thanks! I may be wearing a size 11 boot by Thirty Two, do you think that would still fit with the 154?

    Cheers,
    Austin

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: January 19, 2022 at 10:25 am

      That’s a tight one.

      Reply
  • Justin says: January 20, 2022 at 10:43 am

    Hello, I am 5’10”, 200lbs and wear a 10.5. Would you recommend the 157 or 160?

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: January 21, 2022 at 3:44 pm

      Dealers choice.

      Reply
  • Marc says: February 8, 2022 at 1:44 pm

    Hey Angry, thank you for your great reviews! I was looking at this board for a while now maybe you can help me make a choice between this (157), the Ride Algorhythm (155w) and the Yes Typo. Advanced Rider, 185cm, 80kg, Bootsize 10.5. Rode the Banana Magic (2015) the last years till it broke and loved it. Mostly groomers, sidehits and Trees (60%) and in the Park (30%). But I want a board that I can still take out on fresh pow and progress there (there goes the 10%). Gonna put Burton Cartels on it. How is the Flex compared to the Magic?
    Cheers, Marc

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: February 9, 2022 at 4:13 pm

      Out of the 3 you have listed you want this. It’ll be a little more lively than the BM.

      Reply
      • Marc says: February 14, 2022 at 2:44 pm

        Thanks for the fast reply! Sounds like you would go for another board there? A local dealer suggested the yes greats, even though I wasn’t really convinced after I saw your review about that board.

        Reply
  • Mike says: February 13, 2022 at 3:24 pm

    Hello, appreciate the review.

    I just purchased this board and was looking for bindings to buy with it. I’m used to using the Flow Fuse Hybrid bindings. Out of the three you recommended, which ones would most likely feel similar?

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: February 13, 2022 at 4:31 pm

      None of them as they’re not a Flow.

      Reply
  • HT says: February 15, 2022 at 2:02 pm

    Hi Angry – so i’ve been riding the same board for the past 10-15 years (Dc mlf iikkaa 154) and i think its time to upgrade. I really like its playful flex (probably has softened after all these years) but its not as fast or as poppy as id like anymore. Im 5.8, 140lbs and been riding for 20+ years but just 5-7 days a year. Mostly groomers so would like a board that is fun on piste (fast edge to edge, stable on blacks, butterable, good with sidehits) but i ride a little of everything really (pow usually not that deep, rails/boxes, small kickers). I’ve scrutinized your reviews and i ve narrowed my list down to: capita mega merc, ride algorythm, lib trs and jones mountain twin. Also i was watching the olympics today and su yimings board (Burton Family Tree 3D Daily Driver Camber) looked really fun. Which do you recommend?

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: February 16, 2022 at 11:03 am

      This, get the Mtn Twin and go ride.

      Reply
  • HT says: February 15, 2022 at 2:11 pm

    Also wouldnt mind getting a dc board again

    Reply
  • B says: March 19, 2022 at 1:30 pm

    Hey Angry,
    I’m 5’11 165 with a 10.5 boot and currently ride a Banana Magic 157. Debating between the 156w or 157 twin, gonna put Cartels on it. What do you recommend?

    Thanks!
    -B

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: March 20, 2022 at 11:03 am

      You’re on the cusp with that boot size. If you’re boots bulky I’d go wide, if it’s footprint is small go with the 57.

      Reply
  • P says: April 14, 2022 at 9:30 am

    Hey Avran! I’ve no way of touching the board before buying, so need to do all my research… Worried about overhang… I’m 6’1, about 180 and boot 11.5, quite bulky Burton Concords… just snagged Katanas L/XL. Will MT 59W be alright or should I go up to 62W (would prefer shorter tho)?
    Thanks!
    P

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: April 14, 2022 at 12:20 pm

      Should be?

      Reply
  • T says: June 23, 2022 at 12:48 pm

    Hey Angry,

    Looking for sizing help on the JMT:
    -6′ 2″
    -230lb
    -US12 Photons
    -Low intermediate skill looking at the JMT as a progression board to keep learning next season

    I’m trying to decide between the 162W or 165W. I’m leaning shorter with the 162W given my skill level but what do you think?

    Reply
    • Angrysnowboarder says: June 23, 2022 at 3:22 pm

      62w for sure.

      Reply

    Leave a reply Cancel reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    What others are saying

    • Angrysnowboarder on The 2022 K2 Special Effects Snowboard Review
    • Jay on The 2022 K2 Special Effects Snowboard Review
    • Angrysnowboarder on The 2022 Jones Mountain Twin Snowboard Review
    • T on The 2022 Jones Mountain Twin Snowboard Review
    • Angrysnowboarder on The 2022 K2 Special Effects Snowboard Review
    • About
    • Contact
    • Home

    About

    Variety is the spice of life. There are plenty of snowboarding websites out there, but not all of them are going to be to your liking. We do things different and we make no apologies for that. You might be offended, shocked, amazed, or inspired on this site. Read it and find out for yourself.

    © 2015 Angry Snowboarder. All rights reserved.